Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the Xperia XZs, with a global score of 90.8 against 77.2. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE's construction is newer than Xperia XZs's, but it is somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. Galaxy S20 FE features a little bit better looking screen than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a bit superior processor than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a larger number of faster cores and more RAM. The Xperia XZs captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a much smaller back-facing camera sensor giving a much worse image quality and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking images and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xperia XZs also counts with faster video frame rates and a much better resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZs, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much better battery life than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 55 percent more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.