Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is better than the Xperia Z4v, with a overall score of 90.8 against 78.8. The Galaxy S20 FE is a notably newer and just a little bit thinner phone than Xperia Z4v, but it is also somewhat heavier. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 FE has a newer 11 version and Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1, counting with some additional features and optimized performance.
Galaxy S20 FE has just a little better processing power than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with more RAM memory. Xperia Z4v counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel number in each inch of display and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Galaxy S20 FE has a slightly better camera than Xperia Z4v, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less megapixels and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a much larger sensor and a bigger diafragm aperture. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a superior storage to install games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a way better battery lifetime than Xperia Z4v, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S20 FE is way more expensive than the Sony Xperia Z4v, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.