Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Blasting black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's score of 90.1. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 FE has a more recent 11 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has Android 10. The Galaxy S20 FE design is lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, even though they were released with only a couple months difference.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a little larger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy S20 FE features a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's processor is just as good as the Galaxy S20 FE one, and although the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate, the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a larger sensor providing a better image quality and a back facing camera with way more MP.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.