Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, having a global score of 90.8 against 78.2. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 FE has newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version, providing the user lots of additional features and better performance. Even when the Galaxy S20 FE and Xiaomi Redmi 9T were released with only 4 months difference, the Galaxy S20 FE is just a little bit lighter and thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a just a little higher screen density and a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has 2 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking lower quality photos and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.