Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is slightly better than iPhone 13 Pro Max's score of 93.2. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older and thicker cellphone than the iPhone 13 Pro Max, but Samsung was able to build it a little bit lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with Android 13 OS, and iPhone 13 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS.
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a bit better looking display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a little smaller display, a quite inferior pixels count in each screen inch and a little lower 1284 x 2778 resolution. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a superior hardware performance than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 6 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photographs or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit superior battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4352mAh.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs more money than the iPhone 13 Pro Max, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.