Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is much better than iPhone X's overall score of 88.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is notably newer than iPhone X, it is noticeably heavier and thicker. IPhone X counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and they are also slower and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone X has a little sharper display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a little smaller display, a little bit worse screen pixel density and a way worse 1125 x 2436 resolution. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than iPhone X, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bigger storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone X, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs more than Apple iPhone X, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.