Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-12-11 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2)'s 77.4 overall score. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a newer phone than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), although it's much heavier and a bit thicker. Both phones we are comparing include Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version and Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little faster processing unit than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit sharper screen than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a higher pixels density and a little bit larger screen.
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) counts with a bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) and Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G both feature really similar batteries duration.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater camera than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a lot higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.