Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Google Pixel, with a general score of 98 against 80.2. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is noticeably newer, but just a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier than Google Pixel. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a way larger display.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more cores. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better camera than Google Pixel, because it has a bigger aperture, a lot higher video quality, a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with lot more megapixels. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has an 81% more battery size.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.