Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Google Pixel 3, having a 98 score against 80. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a newer phone than the Google Pixel 3, although it is somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little sharper display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a just a bit better pixel count per inch in the screen, a bigger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72% greater battery capacity. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a way better video resolution.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.