Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, with a 98 score against 82.9. Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a just a bit thicker and heavier phone than Google Pixel 4 XL. The Google Pixel 4 XL has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a little bit worse 1440 x 3040 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater display pixel density.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with greater battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor, a much more megapixels camera in the back and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 4 XL. If you want to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 4 XL, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.