Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2022-07-21 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is way better than Google Pixel 6a's global score of 76.4. These devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version and Google Pixel 6a has Android 12, counting with some extra features. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction has the same thickness than Google Pixel 6a, but it's heavier.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a brighter display than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a little bit better pixels density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a little larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better performing CPU than Google Pixel 6a, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much better resolution camera in the back and a much better video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 6a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4410mAh.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more than Google Pixel 6a, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.