Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.17 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 11.65, which is much better than Honor 50 Pro's global score of 9.17. Even being the best device in this comparison review, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is older, thicker and heavier than the Honor 50 Pro. Both phones we are comparing here use the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide the same operating system features.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little sharper display than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a little bigger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a little greater screen density. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has more memory for apps and games than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better processing power than Honor 50 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little longer battery performance than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better photographs and videos than Honor 50 Pro, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger camera aperture to capture better captures in low-light situations and a lot better video definition.