Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-06 | -- |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black and Epi Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO |
| 509 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than Honor Magic6 Pro, with a 98 score against 76.6. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a just a little bit lighter device than the Honor Magic6 Pro, but both are 0.35inches thick. Both devices we compare here have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version and Honor Magic6 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better screen than Honor Magic6 Pro, because it has a bit higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a quite larger display and a just a bit higher pixels count in each inch in the display. The Honor Magic6 Pro has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G. They have a 12 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Honor Magic6 Pro, because although it has a way tinier sensor giving a way worse image quality and a way smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing images and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a camera in the back with much more MP and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Honor Magic6 Pro counts with a greater memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. Honor Magic6 Pro counts with a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.