Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 509 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is a lot better than HTC U11's score of 77.6. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is way newer than the HTC U11's, but it's thicker and a lot heavier. HTC U11 has a display that is just as good as the screen in Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although the HTC U11 has a way smaller display and a bit lower 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixels amount per inch of screen.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better CPU than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than HTC U11, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior battery life than HTC U11, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way better video definition, a way more mega pixels camera and a much bigger camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as HTC U11. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the HTC U11, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.