Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-06 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is much better than the LG G5's 76.1 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is notably newer than LG G5's, although it is somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the previous 13 version and LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
LG G5 has a screen that is just as good as the screen in Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although the LG G5 has a little bit lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels in each inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG G5, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better processing unit than LG G5, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (and also faster). Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a greater camera than LG G5, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures and a much more megapixels back camera.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a really longer battery performance than LG G5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more money than LG G5, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.