Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is way better than the LG G7 Fit's global score of 77. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is newer than LG G7 Fit's, although it's thicker and heavier.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a much better screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse 1440 x 3120 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has much more storage for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has an external memory slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 4 more cpu cores. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better camera than LG G7 Fit, because it has a way more mega pixels back facing camera, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a larger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.