Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is better than the LG G8S ThinQ's general score of 82.5. Despite being the best cellphone in this review, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is thicker and heavier than the LG G8S ThinQ. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version and LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little faster CPU than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a slightly better looking screen than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a quite larger screen and a greater pixels density.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater camera than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much better video quality and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels. LG G8S ThinQ has a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a really longer battery duration than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.