Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is a lot better than the LG K52's overall score of 76. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a somewhat heavier and a little thicker cellphone than LG K52. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version while LG K52 has Android 10, giving lots of additional features.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit faster processing unit than LG K52, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a brighter display than LG K52, because it has a lot better count of pixels per inch in the screen, a quite larger display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3200.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes greater photographs and videos than LG K52, and although they both have a same size aperture and a same size sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than LG K52, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with greater battery lifetime than LG K52, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.