Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.48 x 3.05 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Titanium and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is way better than LG K61's score of 77.6. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than LG K61, we must tell that it's also a somewhat heavier and just a little thicker device. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version and LG K61 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit superior processor than LG K61, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better screen than LG K61, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200, a little larger screen and a greater screen pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better camera than LG K61, because it has a back facing camera with a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution and a way higher video quality. The LG K61 counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K61 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features better battery performance than LG K61, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.