Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is way better than the LG K62's 78.2 global score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and LG K62 has Android 10, so it gives a lot of extra features and optimized performance. Although it's the best phone we are comparing here, it must be told that it's also heavier and a little thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a little better hardware performance than LG K62, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a sharper display than LG K62, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a lot more pixels per screen inch.
LG K62 features a better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG K62 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a greater camera than LG K62, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same camera sensor size, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a much better video quality.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has greater battery life than LG K62, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.