Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is much better than LG K92's 85.4 general score. Although it's the best cellphone in this review, Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than the LG K92. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and LG K92 has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit faster processing unit than LG K92, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little sharper screen than LG K92, because it has a little bit larger screen, more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200.
The LG K92 counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG K92 also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with improved battery life than LG K92, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better photographs and videos than LG K92, and although they both have a same size sensor and the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG K92. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG K92, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.