Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.78 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1157.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 11.65, which is much better than the LG Q70's score of 9.78. Although it's the best we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a somewhat heavier and a little thicker phone than the LG Q70. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 11 version and LG Q70 has Android 10.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better looking screen than LG Q70, because it has a bit larger display, a greater pixels number per display inch and a better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with slightly more memory to store more apps and games than LG Q70, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and LG Q70 have incredibly similar battery durations, although the LG Q70 has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better camera than LG Q70, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and videos and a back camera with much more megapixels.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Q70. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, else you can save some dollars and get the LG Q70, giving up a couple features and specs.