Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than LG V30S ThinQ, having a 98 score against 82.5. Although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is newer than the LG V30S ThinQ, it is much heavier and thicker. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and LG V30S ThinQ feature really similar displays, because although the LG V30S ThinQ has a little worse resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixel count per inch of screen.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes way better pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way more mega pixels camera, a lot bigger camera sensor and a much better video quality. The LG V30S ThinQ has a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more than the LG V30S ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.