Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the LG V35 ThinQ, with a 98 score against 81.3. Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is newer than LG V35 ThinQ, it's extremely heavier and thicker. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower 1440 x 2880 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit superior CPU than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots way better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking images and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way more MP camera in the back, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way bigger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better memory to store more apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a really longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.