Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-06-17 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 8.18 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black and Forged Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Motorola Defy (2021), having a overall score of 98 against 77.2. Even though Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is older than the Motorola Defy (2021), it's design is thinner and a bit lighter. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version while Motorola Defy (2021) has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better looking screen than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has much more pixels per inch of screen, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a little larger display.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features much more memory for games and applications than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better camera than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a tinier sensor taking less light and duller colors, it also counts with a way better video resolution and a much more megapixels back camera.
The Motorola Defy (2021)'s battery life is very similar to the battery performance in Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.