Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, getting a 98 score against 87.1. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version while Motorola Edge 20 Lite has Android 11 version, so it gives you a couple nice extra features. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is older, a little thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola Edge 20 Lite.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little sharper screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because it has a better 1440 x 3200 resolution, a better screen pixels density and a little bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit more storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite's battery life is just as good as the battery performance in Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have a 108 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a bigger aperture and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.