Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 20 Pro, having a 98 score against 92.8. Although it's the best in this comparison, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 20 Pro. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and Motorola Edge 20 Pro has Android 12 version, providing a lot of extra features and some performance improvements.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a bit better processing power than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G. Both have the same number of cores and 12 GB of RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has a greater screen pixels density, a quite bigger display and a better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a bigger aperture. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.