Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Mineral Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is better than Motorola Edge (2022)'s 84.7 general score. Although it's the best in our current comparison, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is much older, just a little bit thicker and heavier than the Motorola Edge (2022). Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better performance than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better display than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200, a higher pixel density and a little bigger screen.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way better video quality and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Edge (2022) has a battery performance that is just as good as the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G one.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Edge (2022), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Edge (2022). If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Edge (2022), letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.