Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Motorola Edge (2024), getting a overall score of 98 against 78.5. Even though the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than Motorola Edge (2024), it must be told that it is also a much older, a bit thicker and a lot heavier cellphone. These devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version and Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14.
Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a little bit smaller display, a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit inferior count of pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge (2024), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and the Motorola Edge (2024) feature incredibly similar batteries.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has a much tinier back-facing camera sensor, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Edge (2024), but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.