Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than Motorola Edge 30 Neo's overall score of 83.1. Although the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, we must highlight that it is also way older, notably heavier and thicker. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a bit higher pixel count per screen inch, a little bit larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior camera than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way higher 108 MP resolution back facing camera and a lot better video definition. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has superior battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.