Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, with a 98 score against 80.9. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an a lot older, heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a little lower display pixel density, a quite smaller display and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels, a lot larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and faster 30 fps video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's battery life is very similar to the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.