Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Motorola Edge 40, with a general score of 98 against 77.2. Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better cellphone than Motorola Edge 40, it must be told that it is also incredibly older, much heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones come with the same Android 13 OS, so both should provide the user the same OS features.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola Edge 40 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a bit smaller display, a lot worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit lower pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 40, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better camera than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a way smaller aperture and a lot tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.