Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is way better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's score of 77. Although it's the best device in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a much older, a lot heavier and thicker device than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Both of these devices use the same Android 13 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little less pixels per inch in the screen and a little smaller screen. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior camera than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a lot tinier camera sensor, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a camera with a much better resolution and a much better video resolution. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a battery performance that's just as good as the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.