Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro's 83.4 general score. Both phones we compare here use the same Android 13 OS. Although it's the best in this comparison review, we must tell that it is also notably older, heavier and a bit thicker. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a little inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen, a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has more storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4600mAh. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a way tinier back camera sensor which offers a lot lower image and video quality and slower 24 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.