Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a 98 score against 81.9. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is noticeably older, much heavier and a bit thicker than Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a brighter screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a bit worse 1256 x 2760 resolution. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a lot smaller back camera sensor capturing way lower quality pictures and videos, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way better video resolution and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.