Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, having a score of 98 against 86.3. Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, it must be noted that it's also extremely older, a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Both have 12 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a bit smaller display.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a much tinier back-facing camera sensor providing a way worse image quality and a lot tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a way better video definition.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.