Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, having a general score of 98 against 87.1. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a much older, heavier and just a little thicker phone than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better looking display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller screen. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a little better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a way smaller back camera sensor capturing lot worse quality images, it also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution and a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.