Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is way better than Motorola Moto G 5G's 81.5 overall score. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version while Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10, so it provides you a couple nice extra features and optimized performance. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older and a little heavier cellphone than Motorola Moto G 5G, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat thinner anyway.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a slightly better screen than Moto G 5G, because it has a higher display pixel density, a little bit larger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures greater videos and photos than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a much better 108 MP resolution back facing camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 128 GB internal memory. The Moto G 5G and Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G have really similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.