Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 10.21 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 11.65, which is better than Motorola Moto G 5G's 10.21 overall score. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 11 version while Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10, so it provides you a couple nice extra features and optimized performance. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older and a little heavier cellphone than Motorola Moto G 5G, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat thinner anyway.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a slightly better screen than Moto G 5G, because it has a higher display pixel density, a little bit larger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures greater videos and photos than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a much better 108 MP resolution back facing camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Moto G 5G counts with a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G.