Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.54 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1157.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Motorola Moto G Power, having a 11.65 score against 9.54. Although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and Motorola Moto G Power were released with only 1 months difference, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is heavier but just a bit thinner than Motorola Moto G Power. These phones use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a little bigger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a greater count of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G Power, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better processing power than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a camera with lot more MP, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos and a much better video quality.
Motorola Moto G Power features greater battery life than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Power. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, else you can save some money and buy the Moto G Power, letting go some features and specifications.