Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is much better than Moto G Power (2021)'s score of 76.5. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older and just a little bit heavier phone than Moto G Power (2021), but Samsung could make it just a bit thinner anyway. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because it has a much higher screen pixels density, a little bit bigger display and a lot higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Power (2021), because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way better camera than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same back camera sensor size, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way higher video resolution and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and Moto G Power (2021) count with quite similar batteries duration.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Power (2021). If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.