Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), having a 98 score against 76. Both of these devices work with the same Android 13 operating system, so both should offer identical operating system features. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is notably older and a little heavier than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), it's construction is still a bit thinner.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because it has a better 1440 x 3200 resolution, more pixels per inch in the display and a little larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot more MP back facing camera, a bigger aperture and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s battery duration is just as good as Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.