Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-04-15 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is better than the Motorola Moto G100's 88.9 overall score. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and Motorola Moto G100 has Android 11 version, so it gives you lots of additional features and enhanced performance. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is just a little thinner than the Motorola Moto G100, but it's a little heavier and was released about 13 months before.
Moto G100 features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better looking screen than Moto G100, because it has a little more pixels per inch in the screen, a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a little bigger screen.
The Motorola Moto G100 counts with a little bit better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G100 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G100's battery lifetime is very similar to Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery duration.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots clearer videos and photos than Moto G100, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light images, and they both have a same size sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much better 108 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.