Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than Moto G200 5G, with a score of 98 against 86.2. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a a bit heavier cellphone than the Moto G200 5G, but both of them have the same thickness. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version and Moto G200 5G has Android 11.
The Moto G200 5G's processing unit is very similar to Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's CPU, and although the Moto G200 5G has 4 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little more vivid display than Moto G200 5G, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a greater display pixels density and a quite bigger display.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger aperture to capture better captures in low light situations and a much higher video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Moto G200 5G and Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G have very similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.