Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-02-16 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Pastel sky and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 11.65, which is much better than Motorola Moto G30's score of 9.79. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is older and just a little heavier than Motorola Moto G30, it's body is still a bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better looking display than Moto G30, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, much more pixels per inch of display and a bit larger screen. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than Moto G30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting images and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP and a much better video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a slightly better memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G30, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB. Moto G30 has greater battery life than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G.
