Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-02-16 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Pastel sky and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto G30's score of 78.1. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is older and just a little heavier than Motorola Moto G30, it's body is still a bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better looking display than Moto G30, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, much more pixels per inch of display and a bit larger screen. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a slightly better memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G30, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
Moto G30 and Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G count with very similar batteries performance. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than Moto G30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting images and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP and a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.