Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-12-06 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Baby Blue and Mineral Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Motorola Moto G31, with a 98 score against 77. Even being the best in our current comparison, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older, just a bit thicker and heavier phone than the Motorola Moto G31. These devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version while Motorola Moto G31 has Android 11, offering a couple additional features and performance improvements.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G31, because it has a little greater pixels density, a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a bit larger screen. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G31, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G31, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits 24 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Moto G31's battery lifetime is just as good as Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery duration.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than Moto G31, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and a much better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.