Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2022-01-28 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G41's 79.1 global score. Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than Motorola Moto G41, we must highlight that it's also older, just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. These devices work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and Motorola Moto G41 has Android 11, counting with some extra features and a performance increase.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G41, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit sharper display than Moto G41, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Moto G41, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light images and video, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a camera with a way better 108 MP resolution. The Motorola Moto G41 has a slightly better storage for games and applications than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto G41 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Moto G41's battery lifetime is just as good as Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.