Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-12-20 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G51 5G's score of 77.8. Despite of the fact Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is older and a little heavier than Motorola Moto G51 5G, it's design is still just a bit thinner. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version while Motorola Moto G51 5G has Android 11 version, providing some extra features.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit sharper display than Moto G51 5G, because it has a better screen density, a bit larger screen and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto G51 5G and Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G feature quite similar battery performance. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot more MP back camera and a lot better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.