Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than Motorola Moto G60's global score of 79.5. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older cellphone than Motorola Moto G60, but Samsung could make it a bit lighter and somewhat thinner. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and Motorola Moto G60 has Android 11 version, counting with some nice extra features.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto G60, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a little bigger screen. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto G60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures better videos and photos than Moto G60, and although they both have a 108 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way higher video definition and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with more memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G60, because although it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Moto G60 has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.