Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 10.02 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | -- |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Moto G60s, with a overall score of 11.65 against 10.02. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is just a little bit thinner but a little bit heavier than the Moto G60s. These phones include the same Android 11 OS. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a slightly better display than Moto G60s, because it has a little bigger display, a better pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. The Motorola Moto G60s has a slightly bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better camera than Moto G60s, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light images, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a much higher video quality. Moto G60s features a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G.
