Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Moto G7 Plus, getting a 98 score against 76.1. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is newer than the Moto G7 Plus, it is way heavier and just a bit thicker. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version while Moto G7 Plus has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a bit larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Moto G7 Plus, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures way better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a much better video quality, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs and a much better resolution back camera.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.